Asrock FM2A78M-ITX+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A78M-ITX+  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151207
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 11 '17 at 20:44
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 126
56% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 208
24% 190 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570D
ASRock(1849 990E) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
3.07% Terrible
Lighting 3.67
Reflection 6
Parallax 5.03
3% 4.9 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 4.33
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.82 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.07%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 166
Write 46.1
Mixed 65.4
20% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 10.9
73% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 65
DQ Write 48.8
DQ Mixed 18.9
24% 44.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
371GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 155
Write 153
Mixed 115
105% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2.27
4K Mixed 0.27
90% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown V01D3LF4GB26826813 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.6% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.43 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A78M-ITX+ Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A78M-ITX+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback