Foxconn Z75M-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemFoxconn Z75M-S  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN Z75M-S
Memory14.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '21 at 18:39
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2130-$50
LGA 1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 148
68% 110 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 227
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Device(105B 0D87) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.95% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.7
1% 1 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 2.4
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.95%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$45
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 466 339 349 343 349 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 458
Mixed 431
SusWrite 384
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 49.1
156% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 368
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 108%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
349GB free
Firmware: AQ04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 100 88 36 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 186
Write 158
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 76.3
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
646GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 180 182 180 184 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 136
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 182
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 19.5
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z75M-S Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Foxconn Z75M-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback