Medionpc MS-7728

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Medionpc MS-7728 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDIONPC MS-7728
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110719
Uptime	7.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '21 at 16:58
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2310-$90 15,623 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 53.6 2-Core 136 56% 91.2 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 280 35% 268 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 368F) 2GB CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Lighting 46.3 Reflection 47.2 Parallax 42.3 38% 45.3 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 42.3 Splatting 36.8 32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 244GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 203 212 184 197 228 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61% Good	Read 244 Write 213 Mixed 202 SusWrite 195 48% 213 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 28.4 104% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 162 121% 162 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 129%
Hitachi HCS5C1050CLA382 500GB 1,578 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 253GB free Firmware: JC2OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 100 105 97 98 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 119 Write 102 Mixed 48.7 SusWrite 98 67% 91.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-057.A00LF 16GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	49.1% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 15.7 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 14.3 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	24"	1280 720	SAM07AB SMT24A350

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7728 Builds (Compare 553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

System: Medionpc MS-7728

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	236x
Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples	165x
Core i3-2120Intel $150Bench 51%, 77,810 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	77x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	60x
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples	37x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	22x
MX500 1TBCrucial $74Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	14x

RAM
M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG 8GBNanyaBench 49%, 792 samples	58x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 4GBSamsungBench 45%, 800 samples	52x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 49%, 768 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16