Asus TUF Gaming FX505GE_FX86FE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GE_FX86FE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GE
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210208
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateSep 09 '21 at 08:31
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 648
65% 528 Pts
64-Core 639
40% 639 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1A4E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.63
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.2% Poor
Lighting 32.8
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 29.3
27% 33.6 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 27.1
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 31%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1A4E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 6.4
5% 6.83 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.6
7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.44%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingchuxing 512GB 512GB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 10 145 19 110 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 449
Write 325
Mixed 351
SusWrite 75.1
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 22.8
102% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 43.4
75% 142 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 224%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
673GB free
Firmware: EXF7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2252 2155 1545 1548 1564 1569 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 1,647
Write 2,251
Mixed 1,420
SusWrite 1772
401% 1,772 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 65.8
214% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 759
DQ Mixed 858
648% 874 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 280%
Great: 329%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 23.4
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 24.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 2R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 9% 81 107 5 60 23.8" 1920 1080 DELA0E1 DELL E2417H
Typical TUF Gaming FX505GE_FX86FE Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GE_FX86FE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback