Schenkertechnologiesgmbh XMG PRO (Early 2021)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSchenkertechnologiesgmbh XMG PRO (Early 2021)  (all builds)
MotherboardNB01 PCx0Dx_GN20
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200717
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '21 at 23:38
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 198
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 636
59% 491 Pts
64-Core 773
48% 773 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 65E5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 23.4
Parallax 7.1
5% 12.2 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 9.9
7% 8.93 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1556 1718 2022 1726 1704 1267 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 1,915
Write 2,018
Mixed 1,131
SusWrite 1,666
378% 1,682 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 76.6
252% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 844
DQ Write 681
DQ Mixed 738
559% 754 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 291%
Great: 431%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GF3200C22S2 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.8% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 21.5
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22.8
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XMG PRO (Early 2021) Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Schenkertechnologiesgmbh XMG PRO (Early 2021)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback