Asus H81M-A/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-A/BR  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '21 at 23:00
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590T
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 154
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 266
35% 262 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Zotac(19DA 1294) 1GB
CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 20.6
14% 17.7 fps
MRender 21
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 16.3
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SQ500S37480G 480GB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1C2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 172 118 144 129 133 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.2% Average
Read 201
Write 144
Mixed 172
SusWrite 140
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 20.2
72% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 42.6
DQ Write 55.2
DQ Mixed 47.9
36% 48.6 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 102%
MB2000EBZQC 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: HPG2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 120 136 89 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 143
Write 131
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 115
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 86%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
33GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.9 8.9 13 11 10 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
8.65% Terrible
Read 30
Write 18.8
Mixed 10.3
SusWrite 10.5
21% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
48% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.65%
Great: 18%
Multi Flash Reader 16GB
15GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.4 4.6 4.6 4 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.94% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 3.7
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 4.3
8% 7.18 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.94%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MMXIV 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 15.7
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-A/BR Builds (Compare 438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-A/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback