Acer Nitro AN515-43

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-43  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Octavia_PKS
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateSep 08 '21 at 00:13
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 30.9
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 121
38% 71.4 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 389
37% 306 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Acer(1025 1366) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.28
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.19% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 30
Parallax 3.7
2% 12.1 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.19%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ1 128GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 524
Write 428
Mixed 470
106% 474 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 27.1
4K Mixed 20.1
68% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 278
217% 301 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 130%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
577GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 100 101 102 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 106
Write 7.5
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 100
51% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.7
188% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5700-014.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 13.7
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 12.1
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 249
16% 249 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-43 Builds (Compare 1,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback