Alphasync 1265686

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlphasync 1265686  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 07 '21 at 23:54
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 155
2-Core 304
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,041
98% 814 Pts
64-Core 1,451
90% 1,451 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 8829) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 166
Parallax 156
140% 165 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 129
Splatting 113
109% 136 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 124%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30031 1TB
711GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STPSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1293 2400 1792 1020 1018 990 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1507
Write 2,350
Mixed 1,747
SusWrite 1,419
398% 1,756 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 54.7
207% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,387
DQ Write 1,161
DQ Mixed 1,368
999% 1,305 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 267%
Great: 302%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3200C16K4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 33.1
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 33.9
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 24.5" 1280 720 BNQ7F7D BenQ EX2510
Typical 1265686 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

System: Alphasync 1265686

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $530
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback