Gigabyte GA-MZGLKBP-00

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MZGLKBP-00 (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190319
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Sep 07 '21 at 23:37
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	93%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Silver J5005 2,202 User benchmarks, average bench 40% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	38.6% Below average	Memory 46 1-Core 50.3 2-Core 72.4 35% 56.2 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 208 25% 192 Pts	64-Core 203 12% 203 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605 14,651 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 1000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	2.87% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 3.6 3% 3.23 fps	MRender 4.3 Gravity 3.1 Splatting 3.8 3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.87% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB 30,897 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: UI450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 88 69 48 32 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 308 Write 242 Mixed 231 SusWrite 78.4 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 31.8 4K Mixed 9.4 44% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 81.5 DQ Mixed 40.4 46% 80.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 52%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB 71,657 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 335GB free Firmware: SBK2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 73 74 72 77 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 59.7 Write 71.1 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 71.6 43% 58.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 534GB free Firmware: 0502 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 88 88 88 89 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 89.2 Write 54.5 Mixed 54.4 SusWrite 87 52% 71.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 2x8GB 815 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.7% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 9 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 176 23% 176 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	30	84.6"	1280 720	SAM0D3A SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-MZGLKBP-00 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MZGLKBP-00

CPU
Pentium Silver J5005IntelBench 40%, 2,202 samples	14x

GPU
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	14x

SSD
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBAdata $59Bench 213%, 34,063 samples	2x
WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GBWDCBench 43%, 30,897 samples	2x
SSD370S 128GBTranscend $70Bench 74%, 10,510 samples	1x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 2x8GBUnknownBench 73%, 815 samples	2x
CT4G4SFS824A.C8FF 2x4GBCrucialBench 72%, 238 samples	1x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16