PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Zoostorm 7200-5325A (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK H110M-R |
Memory | 8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190703 |
Uptime | 3.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 07 '21 at 17:43 |
Run Duration | 255 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 87% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
74.4%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 400 407 359 392 328 MB/s
|
98%
Outstanding
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
719GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 129 129 129 125 MB/s
|
50.9%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
78.6%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36% | 26% | 31 | 108 | 6 | 60 | 23" | 1920 1080 | ACI23C4 ASUS VC239 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 3x |
Core i3-7100Intel $40Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 3x |
GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 1x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $456 |