Turbo-x E1100

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	19.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Turbo-x E1100 (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte B450M_DS3H
Memory	0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190618
Uptime	21.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 07 '21 at 13:52
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR) 11,837 User benchmarks, average bench 42% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Memory 68.2 1-Core 69 2-Core 134 54% 90.3 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 220 29% 218 Pts	64-Core 212 13% 212 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.50.16.01 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	7% Terrible	Lighting 8.8 Reflection 8.8 Parallax 12.9 7% 10.2 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 10.5 Splatting 8.6 7% 8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 42 45 35 34 21 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.5% Very poor	Read 4.3 Write 128 Mixed 10.1 SusWrite 64.4 12% 51.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 13.8 39% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 84.3 DQ Write 48.1 DQ Mixed 32.1 33% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 55%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,329 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 21GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 6.3 5.8 7.8 7.4 7.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	4.6% Terrible	Read 15.3 Write 9.9 Mixed 8.2 SusWrite 6.5 12% 9.98 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.7 39% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.6% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.M8FF 1x4GB 124 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28% Poor	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 9.6 28% 9.83 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5.9 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 8: 1R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
8%	13%	15	62	42	60	21.5"	1920 1080	AOC2201 22E1W

History: Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 8: 1R 1G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical E1100 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Turbo-x E1100

CPU
A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 42%, 11,837 samples	4x
Core i5-10400Intel $124Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	4x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	1x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	1x
240GB 240GBSSDBench 64%, 5,968 samples	1x

RAM
CT4G4DFS824A.C8FF 1x4GBCrucialBench 40%, 472 samples	2x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	1x
CT4G4DFS824A.M8FE 1x4GBCrucialBench 41%, 381 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16