Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateSep 07 '21 at 10:14
Run Duration432 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 153
2-Core 306
100% 184 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 613
82% 612 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 146
Parallax 150
109% 144 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 137
Splatting 121
104% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,838
Write 7,601
Mixed 7,870
1,806% 8,103 MB/s
4K Read 698
4K Write 341
4K Mixed 382
1,727% 474 MB/s
DQ Read 1,848
DQ Write 1,299
DQ Mixed 1,599
1,188% 1,582 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
263GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1819 1641 1624 1446 1405 1301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
358% Outstanding
Read 2,664
Write 2,475
Mixed 1,931
SusWrite 1,539
483% 2,152 MB/s
4K Read 66.8
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 93
310% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,545
DQ Write 1,202
DQ Mixed 1,358
1,020% 1,368 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 358%
Great: 435%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$215
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 145 152 145 145 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 143
Write 148
Mixed 98.7
SusWrite 146
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83%
Great: 98%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
22GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 154 132 140 156 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 94.3
Write 94.7
Mixed 72
SusWrite 150
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.1
308% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 105%
WD WD80EDAZ-11TA3A0 8TB
818GB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 222 223 216 220 224 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71
271GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 60 60 65 61 62 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 87.8
Write 83
Mixed 52
SusWrite 62
52% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GVR Kingston KHX2133C14D4/8G F4-2400C15-8GVR Kingston KHX2133C14D4/8G 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 29
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 28.8
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 27
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 5R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 22% 59 112 9 60 72.1" 5760 1080 ACI27C3 NV Surround
History: Score 25: 2R 2G 9B | Score 36: 2R 5G 11B | Score 37: 5R 2G 6B
Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $707
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback