Lenovo 80M3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 80M3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Paris G 5A6
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '21 at 17:30
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N3700
CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
25.2% Poor
Memory 34.2
1-Core 24.1
2-Core 48.2
22% 35.5 Pts
4-Core 94.3
8-Core 96.3
13% 95.3 Pts
64-Core 95.2
6% 95.2 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3904) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.71% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 3.5
2% 2.07 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$45
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 234 407 360 339 351 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 477
Write 425
Mixed 422
SusWrite 350
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 36.5
118% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 203
152% 203 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
136GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 204 327 313 321 343 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
44% Average
Read 44.2
Write 322
Mixed 118
SusWrite 306
46% 198 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 19.1
62% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 92.6
DQ Mixed 106
77% 99.7 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 44%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3160ME68FAF1600 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.8% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 6.8
22% 7.77 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 231
17% 231 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD04BD
Typical 80M3 Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $32
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback