MSI MS-17K3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics25% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GP76 Leopard 11UG
MotherboardMSI MS-17K3  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210420
Uptime8.9 Days
Run DateSep 06 '21 at 16:37
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Memory 24.7
1-Core 24.2
2-Core 46.8
19% 31.9 Pts
4-Core 83
8-Core 157
14% 120 Pts
64-Core 253
16% 253 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 1305) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6221
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25% Poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 21.8
18% 20.7 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 77.9
Splatting 50.8
39% 46.1 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 25%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162 1TB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1004 930 534 492 641 647 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 836
Write 949
Mixed 858
SusWrite 708
189% 838 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 16.5
74% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 177
132% 176 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 107%
Great: 386%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 287
14% 287 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17K3 Builds (Compare 3,369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-17K3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback