Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180301
Uptime	15.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '21 at 14:43
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$114 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	79.4% Very good	Memory 75.9 1-Core 121 2-Core 235 80% 144 Pts	4-Core 446 8-Core 647 68% 547 Pts	64-Core 654 40% 654 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3287) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.6% Above average	Lighting 64.6 Reflection 66.5 Parallax 61.9 53% 64.3 fps	MRender 65.2 Gravity 68.2 Splatting 60 52% 64.5 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE360000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 42 44 43 25 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	27.3% Poor	Read 305 Write 55.7 Mixed 116 SusWrite 32.9 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 9 4K Mixed 14.3 37% 10.8 MB/s	DQ Read 45.8 DQ Write 4 DQ Mixed 13.5 13% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 53%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 79GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 149 154 164 162 152 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Read 143 Write 130 Mixed 83.1 SusWrite 155 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 60GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 97 111 115 110 119 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 103 Write 43 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 112 59% 80.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 112%
ipTIME External 750GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 272GB free, PID 3940 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.7 10 10 37 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	4.73% Terrible	Read 4.5 Write 5 Mixed 7 SusWrite 18.7 13% 8.8 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 3% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 4.73% Great: 41%
ipTIME External 500GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 398GB free, PID 3940 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 10 10 36 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.17% Terrible	Read 10 Write 8.9 Mixed 9.5 SusWrite 18.6 16% 11.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 11% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 6.17% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	68.6% Good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 21.7 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 24.4 SC Mixed 22.2 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 88.5 45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 36: 4R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
36%	16%	77	264	187	60	27"	2560 1440	DELD067 DELL U2715H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $199Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,536x
Core i5-8600KIntel $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	838x
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	584x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	406x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	353x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	346x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	148x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	91x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $653

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16