Dynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103  (all builds)
MotherboardDynabook DBIIP301
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210528
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 06 '21 at 13:24
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 126
2-Core 234
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 306
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Device(3100 0002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 7.4
5% 5.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 256GB SSD 256GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.2.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 124 113 120 115 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 410
Write 318
Mixed 362
SusWrite 111
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 43.8
153% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 243
184% 246 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 151%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston RB32D4S2S1ME-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 11.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 14.4
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 67 52 60 15.5" 1536 864 SHP14C3 LQ156M1JW01
Typical SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback