HP p6589es

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p6589es  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100712
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 06 '21 at 11:00
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 142
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 354
38% 302 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210
Device(1B0A 9045) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.63 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG8704RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 227
Write 201
Mixed 82.1
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
6% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 61%
Seagate ST3500410AS 500GB
42GB free
Firmware: CC33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 82 79 85 89 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 96.4
Write 95.4
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 87.8
62% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 72%
Hitachi HDS721064CLA332 640GB
64GB free
Firmware: JPGOA3GC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 82 83 82 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 62.7
Write 59.2
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 82.4
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
16GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 93 101 98 96 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 55.5
Write 91.4
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 98.3
56% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 106%
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB
58GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 8.1 8.7 7.3 7 7.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
6.88% Terrible
Read 10.7
Write 1.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 7.2
6% 5.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1
79% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.88%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE80CE80 M378B5673FH0-CH9 9801 99U5471-020.A00LF M378B5673FH0-CH9 9801 9905471-011.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.2% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 12.4
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 5% 22 4 3 60 27" 1920 1080 HPN346E HP E273m
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 1: 0R 0G 1B
Typical p6589es Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP p6589es

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $320
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback