HP 23-q102a

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 23-q102a  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B45
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '21 at 08:57
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 168
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 324
43% 321 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 2B45) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 5.6
4% 6.83 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 393 412 411 401 374 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 410
Mixed 375
SusWrite 398
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 44.6
147% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 266
215% 304 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 103%
Great: 125%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$7
10GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 13.1
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 13.4
24% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3
208% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
32.9% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23" 1280 720 HWP4225 HP ALL-in-One
Typical 23-q102a Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 23-q102a

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback