Razer Blade Stealth

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 89% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade Stealth (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer LYNETTE_MB
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181112
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '21 at 17:08
Run Duration	300 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%
CPU Throttled	89%

PC Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8565U 81,207 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80% Excellent	Memory 72.5 1-Core 142 2-Core 278 88% 164 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 709 73% 590 Pts	64-Core 688 43% 688 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 1000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.42% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 6.7 Parallax 8.4 6% 7.27 fps	MRender 10.4 Gravity 7.5 Splatting 11.8 8% 9.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.42% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E256 256GB 1,612 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: C280902 SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 248 263 265 256 257 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Read 414 Write 390 Mixed 338 SusWrite 262 79% 351 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 45.3 150% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 120 148% 263 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4E6E304EB-EGCG 2x4GB 8,887 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	MC Read 27 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 21.5 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 29.7 SC Mixed 22.3 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 95.6 42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 30: 6R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
30%	8%	77	105	83	60	13.3"	1280 720	SHP14B8

History: Score 14: 1R 3G 0B | Score 30: 6R 0G 0B | Score 20: 4R 0G 0B | Score 30: 6R 0G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Stealth Builds (Compare 682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Stealth

CPU
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	328x
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	162x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	107x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	199x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	157x
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	91x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	84x
CA3-8D256 256GBLiteonBench 148%, 3,184 samples	49x
MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 121%, 3,154 samples	48x

RAM
K4EBE304EB-EGCG 2x8GBSamsungBench 64%, 14,699 samples	383x
MT52L1G32D4PG-107 2x8GBSamsungBench 58%, 468 samples	65x
K4EBE304EB-EGCF 2x8GBSamsungBench 59%, 5,177 samples	59x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16