Lenovo 90RW000FKR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics71.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90RW000FKR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3743
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210606
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 05 '21 at 07:36
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 159
2-Core 318
100% 187 Pts
4-Core 611
8-Core 1,125
104% 868 Pts
64-Core 1,532
95% 1,532 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
MSI(1462 3797) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 462.46
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.8% Very good
Lighting 89.4
Reflection 89
Parallax 82.8
73% 87.1 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 78.8
Splatting 71.5
70% 87.8 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-256G-1001 256GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21160001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 290 218 221 222 221 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,473
Write 928
Mixed 987
SusWrite 252
202% 910 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 69.2
242% 89.9 MB/s
DQ Read 679
DQ Write 821
DQ Mixed 579
484% 693 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 183%
Great: 184%
RevuAhn_850X1_512GB 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: N0530C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 419 408 414 415 414 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 483
Write 409
Mixed 304
SusWrite 413
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 30.1
105% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 212
173% 245 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 29.7
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 31.9
99% 34.7 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 7 60 28.8" 1280 720 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback