Lenovo 80FF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80FF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G70-80
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150518
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 19:24
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4030U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 56.2
2-Core 103
48% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 150
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 920M
Legend(17AA 381C) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
5.89% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 8.7
6% 8.8 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 7.2
6% 6.57 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.89%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KR064G8 64GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF0A2E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 69 69 70 70 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 368
Write 74.1
Mixed 250
SusWrite 76.9
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 40.2
136% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 90.4
DQ Mixed 87
79% 124 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8A-PB HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 16
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 17.2" 1280 720 CMN1734
Typical 80FF Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80FF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback