Asus PRIME B350M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B350M-K  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 17:01
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 111
2-Core 217
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 612
66% 524 Pts
64-Core 610
38% 610 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gainward(10B0 1381) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 16.9
15% 17.5 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 15.5
15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71F1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 44 2.6 21 126 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 406
Write 340
Mixed 281
SusWrite 61
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 22.7
90% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 42.4
84% 165 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 204 208 206 203 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 171
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 204
121% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 116%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FDD2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.1% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 26.4
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 24.3
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B350M-K Builds (Compare 438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $218
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback