Lenovo 6475D93

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 6475D93  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 6475D93
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 15:48
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo P8600-$42
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
34.7% Below average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 22.7
2-Core 44
31% 43.1 Pts
4-Core 42.2
8-Core 43
6% 42.6 Pts
64-Core 44.1
3% 44.1 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Legend(17AA 20E4) 748MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2869
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.35% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.63 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.33 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.35%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HCC54501 120GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC0D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 15 21 20 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.38% Terrible
Read 13.2
Write 11.7
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 16
9% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 4.8
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 4.6
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 6475D93 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 6475D93

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $42
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback