Toshiba Satellite C50-A490

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite C50-A490  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA PT10S
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131014
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 13:32
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 76.6
1-Core 62.3
2-Core 139
55% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 237
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA36) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.96% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 5.9
3% 4.77 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.96%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3501103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 364 375 306 378 372 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 410
Write 352
Mixed 340
SusWrite 358
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 22.4
110% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 94.8
114% 193 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
29.8% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 8.6
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD033A
Typical Satellite C50-A490 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C50-A490

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $67
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback