Medion D17D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMedion D17D  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION D17D
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160410
Uptime10.9 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 08:56
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 3805U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 87.7
1-Core 62
2-Core 115
56% 88.2 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 122
16% 121 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Device(1B0A 2250) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
2.91% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 3.3
3% 5.9 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.91%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 142 210 61 33 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 377
Write 278
Mixed 276
SusWrite 83.6
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 11.7
61% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 84.7
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 24
49% 96 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.1
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 4% 23 92 29 60 17.2" 1600 900 AUO139E
History: Score 9: 1R 1G 1B | Score 10: 2R 0G 0B | Score 5: 1R 0G 0B
Typical D17D Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Medion D17D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback