__________________________________ _______

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System__________________________________ _______  (all builds)
Motherboard________________ ________________
Memory58.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 07:25
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Not Available
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 88.1
1-Core 162
2-Core 322
103% 191 Pts
4-Core 643
8-Core 879
96% 761 Pts
64-Core 901
56% 901 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 3877 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 171
Parallax 132
120% 150 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 135
Splatting 102
112% 143 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 114%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 512G 512GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 40101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 223 389 378 149 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 453
Mixed 353
SusWrite 269
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 49.3
168% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 253
214% 314 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 103%
Great: 119%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
116GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 116 120 114 103 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 11.2
Write 6
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 116
28% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.2
59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 208 218 219 220 220 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 126
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 215
103% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 029E CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91% Outstanding
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 30.3
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 27.4
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 91%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical _______ Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: __________________________________ _______

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback