Acer Predator GX-792

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator GX-792  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Viper2_KLS
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 01:24
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 114
52% 83.6 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 452
49% 387 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
155GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 15 14 15 15 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 23.2
Write 70.1
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 19
25% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
37% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.5% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 25.9
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 20
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 0" 1280 720
Typical Predator GX-792 Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

System: Acer Predator GX-792

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback