Asus H110-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H110-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170705
Uptime	22.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 03 '21 at 20:19
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4600-$27 16,729 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 115 2-Core 201 80% 137 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 305 41% 305 Pts	64-Core 304 19% 304 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 3690) 2GB CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32% Below average	Lighting 40.2 Reflection 45 Parallax 52.7 33% 46 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 40.2 Splatting 35.2 31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95 9,561 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM11.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 61 52 58 51 56 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.1% Above average	Read 183 Write 142 Mixed 264 SusWrite 60.2 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 38 120% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 31.8 DQ Write 65.9 DQ Mixed 16.6 22% 38.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 83%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 24GB free Firmware: 03.03E03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 66 72 76 75 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 59 Write 52.2 Mixed 40.9 SusWrite 72.3 41% 56.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK4GX4M1A2400C16 Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G 8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 24.1 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 24.6 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	33.1"	1280 720	AOC3279 Q3279WG5B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,764 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H110-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	1,205x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	86x
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	581x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	78x
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	76x

SSD
Green 120GB (2016)WD $84Bench 53%, 21,990 samples	386x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	50x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	39x

RAM
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 76%, 26,065 samples	739x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	98x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $370

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16