HP ProLiant ML150 G6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProLiant ML150 G6  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '21 at 19:47
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5502
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 46.3
2-Core 92.1
45% 70.3 Pts
4-Core 76.9
8-Core 92.6
11% 84.8 Pts
64-Core 89.7
6% 89.7 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GB0250EAFYK 250GB
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPG2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.3 3.6 2.8 44 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30% Below average
Read 77.8
Write 87.3
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 26.4
47% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x1GB
3 of 12 slots used
3GB DIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.1
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 2 1 64 0" 1028 720
Typical ProLiant ML150 G6 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant ML150 G6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback