Gigabyte GA-MRZNVMI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGIGABYTE MRZNVMI-SI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MRZNVMI  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 03 '21 at 18:48
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B Vega Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 196
67% 121 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 488
48% 395 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.50.23.01
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.47% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 14.4
6% 10.8 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 10
8% 9.17 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.47%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV512TDL 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M5MU030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 333 348 324 359 348 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 333
Write 404
Mixed 349
SusWrite 345
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 17.8
60% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 192
139% 183 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFS8266.C8FB 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (87th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.6% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 22" 1280 720 DEL404E DELL P2210
Typical GA-MRZNVMI Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MRZNVMI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback