CDM Q87I-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemCDM Q87I-PLUS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q87I-PLUS
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '21 at 11:05
Run Duration341 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 213
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 579
60% 482 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (67 fps cap detected)
53.2% Above average
Lighting 65.9
Reflection 67.1
Parallax 62.6
54% 65.2 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 67.4
Splatting 59.7
52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$32
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 106 94 103 105 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 340
Write 353
Mixed 308
SusWrite 114
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 14.2
86% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 24.3
74% 155 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 86%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
931GB free
Firmware: 00.0NS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 126 122 127 129 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 154
Write 129
Mixed 116
SusWrite 124
97% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.M16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 16.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 48: 6R 5G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
48% 44% 32 319 238 60 32" 1536 864 @@@0030 MS306
History: Score 34: 4R 3G 5B | Score 46: 6R 4G 4B | Score 58: 8R 4G 6B | Score 32: 3R 4G 5B | Score 48: 6R 5G 3B
Typical Q87I-PLUS Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: CDM Q87I-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $182
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback