Lenovo 10M9000CUK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10M9000CUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3102
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '21 at 10:58
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 82.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 259
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 688
76% 598 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 10.9
12% 13.6 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 14.6
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 325 325 324 324 324 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,551
Write 1,012
Mixed 618
SusWrite 349
195% 883 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 75.7
265% 93.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,393
DQ Write 1,004
DQ Mixed 938
771% 1,112 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 219%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
78.3% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 22.5
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 23.9
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 24.1" 1280 720 HPN36C9 HP Z24n G3
Typical 10M9000CUK Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10M9000CUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback