Asus P8H61-M LE/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE/USB3  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '21 at 22:07
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 178
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 365
48% 364 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Zotac(19DA 3288) 1GB
CLim: 1039 MHz, MLim: 1407 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 23.5
14% 19.8 fps
MRender 22.3
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 17.5
17% 21 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-128 128GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 101 60 43 64 36 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.7% Average
Read 197
Write 121
Mixed 154
SusWrite 72
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 23.4
86% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 56.3
DQ Mixed 28.8
26% 37.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 86%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
21GB free
Firmware: 505ABBF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 52 87 88 88 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 80.8
Write 98.3
Mixed 73
SusWrite 73.9
18% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 8
38% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 4.6
DQ Write 50.8
DQ Mixed 11.2
14% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GR1600D364L11/4G 075D GR1600D3V64L11/8G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.4% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 18
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.8
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LE/USB3 Builds (Compare 640 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback