Asus B85M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus B85M-E  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180404
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '21 at 20:38
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3258-$31
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 67
1-Core 104
2-Core 204
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 213
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
PowerColor(148C 2015) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 23.5
Reflection 32.6
Parallax 31
19% 29 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 21.7
19% 23.7 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 64 68 66 60 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 462
Write 379
Mixed 270
SusWrite 76.3
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 36.5
116% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 306
244% 340 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 110%
PNY SSD2SC240G1CS1754D117-820 240GB
141GB free
Firmware: CS111101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 274 278 264 279 250 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 300
Write 271
Mixed 236
SusWrite 268
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 31.7
108% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 176
159% 241 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HDS721075DLE630 750GB
524GB free
Firmware: MSJOA5R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 133 122 131 123 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 145
Write 126
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 126
77% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 1600 CL9 Series 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1400 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 5R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 22% 50 81 7 60 21.5" 1920 1080 SPT08D5 E225W-1920R
Typical B85M-E Builds (Compare 2,941 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback