Intel B75

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel B75  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '21 at 18:30
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 101
2-Core 201
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 396
53% 397 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 847A) 2GB
CLim: 1326 MHz, MLim: 1592 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 33.9
Parallax 40.7
26% 35.6 fps
MRender 43.5
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 34.2
32% 39.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 393 414 422 443 446 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 457
Mixed 342
SusWrite 399
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 31.7
107% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 170
174% 285 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 116%
Nvme 128GB 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 2009XKR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 502 514 510 87 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 1,245
Write 542
Mixed 637
SusWrite 345
153% 692 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 25.3
141% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 428
DQ Write 533
DQ Mixed 348
300% 436 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 133%
Great: 170%
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: 1AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 144 143 143 146 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 142
Write 62.9
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 142
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
186% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown P34G169UH 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
61.7% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 20
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Builds (Compare 4,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel B75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback