Dynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103  (all builds)
MotherboardDynabook DBIIP301
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '21 at 12:04
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 72
1-Core 125
2-Core 228
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 296
39% 295 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Device(3100 0002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8336
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 6.3
5% 5.47 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 7
Splatting 9
6% 7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 256GB SSD 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.2.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 315 343 310 357 339 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 399
Write 348
Mixed 360
SusWrite 322
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 33.4
116% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 65
DQ Mixed 33.9
29% 41.5 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 151%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 13.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 15.6
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E7
Typical SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback