Asus X550VX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus X550VX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550VX
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '21 at 11:43
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 183
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 533
54% 436 Pts
64-Core 545
34% 545 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-000H1 256GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT24H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 311 266 295 234 54 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 433
Mixed 389
SusWrite 249
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 52.3
181% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 336
252% 336 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
255GB free
Firmware: AX0P3D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 92.9
Write 89.3
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 78.1
53% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT40A512M8HX-093E 0467 RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.2% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 19.7
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 22.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 64 0" 1280 720
Typical X550VX Builds (Compare 1,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550VX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback