Asus Q304UAK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus Q304UAK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q304UAK
Memory16.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160720
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateSep 02 '21 at 02:03
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 53%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 166
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 268
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 1480) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.45% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 5
Parallax 7
5% 5.97 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 9.5
7% 8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.45%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
873GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 384 79 82 76 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
66% Good
Read 384
Write 360
Mixed 347
SusWrite 167
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 16.5
83% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 351
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB 0080 ATECH16GPC42400S 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.6% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 21.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q304UAK Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q304UAK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback