Lenovo 90FB0001US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90FB0001US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3642
Memory14 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateSep 01 '21 at 22:25
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$76
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 185
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 386
46% 357 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(1642 3E56) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.28% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 8.3
6% 6.77 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 5.7
5% 5.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.28%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 379 378 401 408 398 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 370
Mixed 385
SusWrite 386
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 46.4
149% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 260
217% 314 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 104%
Great: 123%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
329GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 113 112 117 116 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 106
Write 102
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 113
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 76%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
113GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 12 22 34 34 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 123
Write 34.6
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 22.2
68% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2.5
189% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 39%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3.3 3.9 4.4 4.4 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
7.09% Terrible
Read 21
Write 14
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 3.8
17% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 2.4
122% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.09%
Great: 13%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
22GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.1 0.4 13 8.5 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 13.7
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 8.3
17% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.3
100% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 0215 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 20GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
63.9% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 20.5
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 18.2
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 23.5" 1280 720 AOC2476 2476WM
Typical 90FB0001US Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90FB0001US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $152
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback