Medion MD34397/C909

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion MD34397/C909  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B350A4-EM
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190220
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 01 '21 at 10:07
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 65.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 193
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 606
56% 465 Pts
64-Core 607
38% 607 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Elitegroup(1019 1047) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6647
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 32.5
27% 33.1 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 23.3
25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26%
Great: 28%
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
Elitegroup(1019 A4CD) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.50.02
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 34.6
Parallax 28.3
17% 27.8 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 14.1
13% 16.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E12-512G-PHISON-SSD-B3-BB1 512GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12A1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 527
Write 974
Mixed 284
134% 595 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 34.3
134% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 805
DQ Write 614
DQ Mixed 406
386% 609 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 218%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
288GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 440 445 454 463 298 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 474
Mixed 451
SusWrite 416
104% 459 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 50.2
165% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 360
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 113%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-017.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 26
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 22.5
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 0R 5G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 28% 25 278 202 60 23" 1920 1080 DEL4084 DELL S2340T
Typical MD34397/C909 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Medion MD34397/C909

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback