Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_K512JP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_K512JP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JP
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime10 Days
Run DateAug 31 '21 at 20:01
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 83
1-Core 134
2-Core 256
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 642
69% 551 Pts
64-Core 639
40% 639 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 84%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Asus(1043 1B2F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 15.3
13% 16.4 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 17.8
Splatting 0.1
7% 10.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 71 57 55 73 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,348
Write 885
Mixed 736
SusWrite 118
171% 772 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 73.7
269% 98.9 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 827
DQ Mixed 222
272% 461 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 170%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 12
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 NCP0046
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_K512JP Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_K512JP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback