HP mt42 Mobile Thin Client

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP mt42 Mobile Thin Client (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 815A
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160728
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 31 '21 at 17:22
Run Duration	256 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A8-8600B R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G 827 User benchmarks, average bench 33% U4500, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Memory 18.2 1-Core 19.9 2-Core 35 14% 24.4 Pts	4-Core 25.1 8-Core 55.4 5% 40.2 Pts	64-Core 57.9 4% 57.9 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics 1,720 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 815A) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.Q3 Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	2.29% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 4.6 Parallax 3.3 2% 3.47 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 3.8 3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.29% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon L8H-256V2G-HP 256GB 4,213 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2803 SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 245 245 264 252 268 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	52% Above average	Read 379 Write 275 Mixed 208 SusWrite 251 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 27 4K Mixed 21 52% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 82.7 DQ Mixed 101 74% 98.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 93%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB 28,774 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 466GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 122 122 120 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	70% Good	Read 127 Write 115 Mixed 64.8 SusWrite 117 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 82%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 2,296 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 3GB free, PID 558a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 13 14 12 14 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 32.4 Write 18.9 Mixed 23.7 SusWrite 13.8 28% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.8 140% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GB 19,666 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 5 14% 4.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 334 12% 334 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 16: 2R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
16%	21%	28	38	22	60	13.9"	1280 720	AUO123D

History: Score 6: 1R 0G 1B | Score 16: 2R 1G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical mt42 Mobile Thin Client Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP mt42 Mobile Thin Client

CPU
PRO A8-8600B R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 33%, 827 samples	22x

GPU
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 1,720 samples	11x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,679 samples	11x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	1x
L8H-128V2G-11 M.2 2280 128GBLiteonBench 67%, 864 samples	1x
L8H-256V2G-HP 256GBLiteonBench 74%, 4,213 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 19,666 samples	3x
8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 2x4GBMicronBench 34%, 894 samples	2x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16