Asus H61M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H61M-K  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130827
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateAug 31 '21 at 15:41
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 187
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 302
45% 326 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1099 MHz, MLim: 1474 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Lighting 49.1
Reflection 51.6
Parallax 62.1
40% 54.3 fps
MRender 47.7
Gravity 48.3
Splatting 36.4
35% 44.1 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE200 SSD 120GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMB1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 22 7.9 18 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 82%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
438GB free
Firmware: AM0B3J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 103 109 104 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 49.9
Write 105
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 104
52% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-035.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 1R 4G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 14% 50 107 6 120 27" 1920 1080 AOC2702 27G2G4
Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback