HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1849
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '21 at 15:37
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-4300M APU-$88
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Memory 57.7
1-Core 51
2-Core 39.7
35% 49.5 Pts
4-Core 47.2
8-Core 57.9
7% 52.6 Pts
64-Core 61.6
4% 61.6 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7420G
HP(103C 1849) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
1.99% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 4
Parallax 2
2% 2.73 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.99%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$79
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 252 251 245 261 265 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 342
Write 253
Mixed 276
SusWrite 250
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 25.8
96% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 140
109% 150 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 91%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
115GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 106
Write 46.9
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 18
46% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
34% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3150ED58E8W1600 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
23.4% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 8.4
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9.4
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 0" 1280 720
Typical Pavilion g6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback