Asus F1A75-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20120813
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 31 '21 at 15:28
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3850 APU-$80 3,108 User benchmarks, average bench 46% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Memory 80.8 1-Core 45.7 2-Core 91.9 48% 72.8 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 184 24% 183 Pts	64-Core 182 11% 182 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120 38,521 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B E258) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	20% Poor	Lighting 24.7 Reflection 25.9 Parallax 31.6 20% 27.4 fps	MRender 24 Gravity 24.7 Splatting 24 20% 24.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 29 27 22 22 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 477 Write 443 Mixed 305 SusWrite 33.4 70% 315 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 63.5 4K Mixed 34.6 122% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 152 144% 224 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 108%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 372GB free Firmware: 070H SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 219 223 225 224 262 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 403 Write 242 Mixed 248 SusWrite 230 63% 281 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 58.3 4K Mixed 13.7 73% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 23.4 42% 84.2 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 2x2GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 7.8 25% 8.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 8.8 21% 7.47 GB/s	Latency 79.1 51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 17: 3R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
17%	20%	25	85	6	60	20"	1600 900	SAM063D SMB2030

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-M PRO Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M PRO - $80

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	20x
A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples	10x
A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	4x
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	3x

SSD
THNSNF128GCSS 128GBToshibaBench 68%, 2,061 samples	3x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	3x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	2x
HX316C10FB/4 HX316C10FB/8 12GBKingstonBench 31%, 3 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $220

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16