PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Jginyue X79M-PLUS (all builds) |
Memory | 28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210311 |
Uptime | 1.9 Days |
Run Date | Aug 30 '21 at 23:34 |
Run Duration | 182 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
70.8%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 361C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk X400 M.2 2280 128GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 103 96 95 101 100 MB/s
|
80.8%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1K04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 161 161 161 162 161 MB/s
|
95.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M392B1K73CM0- 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
|
39.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 120 | 27" | 1280 720 | MSI3CA9 MSI G27C4 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples | 15x |
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 15x |
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 13x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 10x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $200 |