Asus Z9PA-U8 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Z9PA-U8 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PA-U8 Series
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '21 at 21:56
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2658 v2
Socket-R 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 165
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 589
54% 453 Pts
64-Core 904
56% 904 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Device(107D 2740) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 309.08
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.75% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 1.2
3% 2.63 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 2.6
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.75%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
79GB free
Firmware: 6.0.1a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 115 117 115 109 118 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.8% Above average
Read 241
Write 141
Mixed 194
SusWrite 115
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 32.1
113% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 141
110% 153 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 80%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 45 33 28 50 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 64.6
Write 65.3
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 43.4
44% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 76%
WD WD10EURS-630AB1 1TB
921GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 100 100 102 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 104
Write 99.2
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 101
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.9% Above average
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 19.4
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 10.3
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 18.5" 1097 595 ACI19F2 ASUS VS197
Typical Z9PA-U8 Series Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Asus Z9PA-U8 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $705
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback