| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
| Motherboard | Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120406 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 30 '21 at 18:22 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
49%
Average
|
60% 104 Pts
|
21% 159 Pts
|
10% 158 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.5%
Poor
|
29% 37.8 fps
|
27% 33.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03170007
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 46 47 46 47 47 MB/s
|
50.2%
Above average
|
53% 237 MB/s
|
94% 30.8 MB/s
|
35% 49.3 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend JM1333KLN-2G 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
51%
Above average
|
52% 18.1 GB/s
|
44% 15.3 GB/s
|
40% 99.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 144 | 27" | 1280 720 | SAM710D F27G3xTF |
Typical H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M Builds (Compare 67 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 9x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 7x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $60Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 5x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 4x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $342 |