Packard imedia S3810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPackard imedia S3810  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard imedia S3810
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100505
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateAug 30 '21 at 15:49
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 139
58% 97.8 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 209
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
PNY(196E 0828) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.37 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 204 205 204 201 117 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.8% Below average
Read 222
Write 204
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 187
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 0.5
28% 9.43 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 94.1
DQ Mixed 32.4
52% 102 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 92%
Generic- SD/MMC 0GB
0GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.9 2.1 2.1 1.8 2.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
0.92% Terrible
Read 1.7
Write 1.7
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 1.9
2% 1.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
8% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.92%
Great: 3%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
23GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 6.5 5.7 5.6 5.7 6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
7.48% Terrible
Read 25.1
Write 16.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 6.9
21% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.48%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Toshiba ACR256X64D3U1333C9 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 12.4
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7.8
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM0530 SAMSUNG
Typical imedia S3810 Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S3810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $110
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback