Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive407% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '21 at 04:47
Run Duration388 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 84.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 281
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 1,013
94% 785 Pts
64-Core 2,155
133% 2,155 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
MSI(1462 373E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 149
Parallax 148
124% 149 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 131
Splatting 116
113% 142 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 116%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3243 3269 2755 746 752 760 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
407% Outstanding
Read 2,957
Write 3,369
Mixed 2,945
SusWrite 1,921
631% 2,798 MB/s
4K Read 83.1
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 118
387% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1,215
DQ Write 1,075
DQ Mixed 1,137
855% 1,143 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 407%
Great: 442%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
459GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 451 451 449 449 295 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 447
Mixed 439
SusWrite 424
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 95.4
4K Mixed 55.3
184% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 113%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
465GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 451 451 449 449 296 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 444
Mixed 452
SusWrite 424
102% 456 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 55.3
183% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 112%
Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
894GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1905 1912 1637 1543 1550 1552 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 2,570
Write 1,906
Mixed 1794
SusWrite 1,683
445% 1,988 MB/s
4K Read 67.7
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 94
310% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,286
DQ Write 1,141
DQ Mixed 1,213
909% 1,213 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 356%
Great: 410%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 169 172 173 172 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 151
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 169
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 98%
Great: 101%
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 147 147 149 146 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 142
Write 141
Mixed 103
SusWrite 145
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 83%
Kingston DT microDuo 3C 64GB
28GB free, PID 16ae
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 19 19 19 19 20 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 108
Write 43.3
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 20
51% 47.6 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
46% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 28%
WDC WD20 EADS-11R6B1 2TB
2TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.4 5.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 78.7
Write 5
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 5.3
20% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 34%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-22GXCB0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 96 96 95 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.6% Average
Read 101
Write 77.8
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 94.7
109% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.43 MB/s
Hitachi HTS542580K9SA00 80GB
39GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 13 12 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.6% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 29.5
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 12.5
31% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 0.7 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2Z3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 49.5
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 41.2
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 39.6
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 118%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 165 34.1" 1280 720 SAM711A LC34G55T
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $21

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $836
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback